Discord
05-26-2019, 01:42 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-26-2019, 04:31 AM by RedGreenBlue.
Edit Reason: agh grammar
)
The handwriting on the papers is immaculate, to the point of looking like it was produced by a computer, though the occasional unevenness in ink thickness betrays the look.
Prosthetic full-arm replacements work far better than anticipated. No issues with articulation and movement is present, and AL subject claims to be comfortable with their use.
Unfortunately, we will have to pay the price of fixing this wall.
Maybe we could have found a test subject with a little more self-control.
Another paper reads:
Artificial Healing Serum Test Results (Note to self: Come up with a better name)
-Healing aspect works as intended; test subjects report recovery as they would from any food-type.
-Test subjects also describe the taste as unpalatable. Specific descriptions by individual test subjects follow:
-"Like someone took every single good thing about food and tossed it out the window."
-"Tastes like sadness and decay."
-"What did you just feed me?" (Subject left before the test concluded.)
-"I felt better before you fed me that."
-"That was so vile that I may not ever eat a single thing ever again in fear that I will associate the taste of food with what you have done the injustice of making me consume."
-It is safe to conclude that the taste needs improving. Further testing will need to be done towards this goal.
Other notes: Shows promise. If we can improve the taste, we may be able to produce this as a cheap and readily available food source for TCPs. At the very least, it can be used to supplement use of our ability.
Prosthetic full-arm replacements work far better than anticipated. No issues with articulation and movement is present, and AL subject claims to be comfortable with their use.
Unfortunately, we will have to pay the price of fixing this wall.
Maybe we could have found a test subject with a little more self-control.
Another paper reads:
Artificial Healing Serum Test Results (Note to self: Come up with a better name)
-Healing aspect works as intended; test subjects report recovery as they would from any food-type.
-Test subjects also describe the taste as unpalatable. Specific descriptions by individual test subjects follow:
-"Like someone took every single good thing about food and tossed it out the window."
-"Tastes like sadness and decay."
-"What did you just feed me?" (Subject left before the test concluded.)
-"I felt better before you fed me that."
-"That was so vile that I may not ever eat a single thing ever again in fear that I will associate the taste of food with what you have done the injustice of making me consume."
-It is safe to conclude that the taste needs improving. Further testing will need to be done towards this goal.
Other notes: Shows promise. If we can improve the taste, we may be able to produce this as a cheap and readily available food source for TCPs. At the very least, it can be used to supplement use of our ability.